4.2 Article

Risk group assignment differs for children and adults 145yr with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated by the NOPHO ALL-2008 protocol

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 5, Pages 404-412

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ejh.12097

Keywords

acute lymphoblastic leukemia; adults; adolescents; children; minimal residual disease; pediatric protocol

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  3. Herlev University Hospital Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The prognosis of acute lymphoblastic leukemia is poorer in adults than in children. Studies have indicated that young adults benefit from pediatric treatment, although no upper age limit has been defined. Design and methods We analyzed 749 patients aged 145yr treated by the NOPHO ALL-2008 protocol. Minimal residual disease (MRD) on days 29 and 79, immunophenotype, white blood cell count (WBC), and cytogenetics were used to stratify patients to standard-, intermediate-, or high-risk treatment with or without hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Results Adults aged 1845 had significantly lower WBCs at diagnosis compared with children aged 19 and 1017yr, but significantly more adults were stratified to high-risk chemotherapy (8%, 14%, 17%; P<0.0001) or high-risk chemotherapy with transplantation (4%, 13%, 19%; P<0.0001). This age-dependent skewing of risk grouping reflected more T-ALL (11%, 27%, 33%, P<0.0001), poorer MRD response day 29 (MRD <0.1%: 75%, 61%, 52%; P<0.0001), and more MLL gene rearrangements (3%, 3%, 10%; P=0.005) in older patients. Conclusions Even if identical diagnostics, treatment, and risk stratification are implemented, more adults will be stratified to high-risk therapy, which should be considered when comparing pediatric and adult outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available