4.5 Article

Prognosis of gastric adenocarcinoma patients with various burdens of peritoneal metastases

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 29-35

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.24087

Keywords

gastric adenocarcinoma; peritoneal metastases; cytology; outcome

Funding

  1. UTMDACC
  2. NCI [138671, CA172741, P30CA316672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundPeritoneal metastases (PM) in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) may be identified by diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) or imaging (I). Although prognosis is poor, some patients have excellent outcome. We compared the overall survival (OS) of patients in 3 groups: those with positive cytology (CY+) by DL (DL-CY+), those with gross PM (GPM) by DL (DL-GPM+) and with GPM obvious on I (I-GPM+). Methods146 GAC patients were identified. The Kaplan-Meier analysis, univariate, and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were employed. ResultsPatients were primarily men (67%), with good ECOG scores (0-1; 89%), had DL (84%), had poorly differentiated GAC (92%), and had received chemotherapy (89%). The median OS for all patients was 15 months (5%CI, 12.9-18.2 months). The DL-CY+ group had median OS of 22.5 months (95%CI, 15-29.3 months). Patients with I-GPM+ had four times the risk of death than those with DL-CY+ (P<0.001) and patients with DL-GPM+ had two times the risk of death than those with DL-CY+ (P=0.001). At 36 months, all DL-GPM+ and I-GPM+ had died but 8 patients with DL-CY+ remained alive. ConclusionsSome GAC patients with DL-CY+ have long OS; therefore, novel strategies to further prolong their OS are needed. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:29-35. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available