4.2 Article

High white blood cell count at diagnosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia: biological background and prognostic impact. Results from the NOPHO ALL-92 and ALL-2000 studies

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages 38-46

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2010.01522.x

Keywords

white blood cell; acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; children; survival; prognostic factors; minimal residual disease

Categories

Funding

  1. Childhood Cancer Foundation, Denmark
  2. University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  4. Nordic paediatric oncology centers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Prognostic impact of peripheral blood white blood cell count (WBC) at the diagnosis of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) was evaluated in a population-based consecutive series of 2666 children aged 1-15 treated for ALL between 1992 and 2008 in the five Nordic countries (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden). Ten-year event-free (pEFS(10y)) survival and overall (pOS(10y)) survival were 0.75 +/- 0.01 and 0.85 +/- 0.01, respectively. Although treatment intensity was determined by WBC, non-remission and relapsed patients still had significantly higher WBC than those in remission for B-cell precursor (BCP) (median WBC: 24.8 vs. 14.0 vs. 8.3 x 109/L, P < 0.001), but not for T-lineage (T-ALL) (median WBC: 127.8 vs. 113.0 vs. 86.8 x 109/L, P = 0.22). pEFS was inversely related to WBC for BCP (P < 0.001), but not for T-ALL. WBC was not associated with risk of event for BCP or T-ALL for patients with minimal residual disease at the end of induction (MRDd29) < 10-3. In contrast, for MRDd29 >= 10-3 and < 5% leukaemic blasts in bone marrow at day 29, the pEFS(5y) for WBC < 100.0 (N = 152) vs. >= 100.0 (N = 19) was 0.76 vs. 0.50 (P = 0.001). That was the case both for BCP (pEFS(5y) 0.76 vs. 0.58) and for T-ALL (pEFS(5y) 0.71 vs. 0.38). Whether the inferior EFS for the subset of patients with high WBC and slow initial response to treatment reflects rare or overlooked cytogenetic aberrations as well as the factors that determine WBC levels at diagnosis awaits exploration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available