4.5 Article

Surgical Resection Versus Transarterial Chemoembolization for BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages 404-409

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jso.23854

Keywords

BCLC; surgical resection; transarterial chemoembolization; treatment algorithm; hepatocellular carcinoma

Funding

  1. Center of Excellence for Cancer Research at Taipei Veterans General Hospital [DOH102-TD-C-111-007]
  2. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V103C-008]
  3. Ministry of Education, Aiming for the Top University Plan [103AC-P618]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundSorafenib is the only recommended treatment for patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to compare surgical resection (SR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for advanced (BCLC stage C) HCC patients. MethodsA total of 264 and 389 advanced HCC patients received SR and TACE, respectively. Among them, 163 matched pairs of patients were identified from each treatment arm by propensity score matching analysis to compare long-term survival. ResultsOf all patients, the SR group had better liver functional reserve than the TACE group. In the matched propensity model, the baseline characteristics were similar between patients receiving SR and TACE. SR provided significantly better long-term survival than TACE in all patients and in patients selected in the propensity model (both P<0.001). In the Cox proportional hazards model, patients receiving TACE had a 2.393-fold increased risk of mortality compared with patients receiving SR (95% confidence interval: 1.610-3.556, P<0.001). ConclusionsSR provides significantly better long-term survival than TACE in patients with BCLC stage C HCC, and should be an integral part in the management of advanced HCC. Multidisciplinary approaches for these patients and further amendment to the BCLC classification scheme are required. J. Surg. Oncol. 2015 111:404-409. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available