4.3 Article

Patient reported symptoms during an ulcerative colitis flare: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 558-564

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MEG.0b013e328326cacb

Keywords

focus groups; inflammatory bowel disease; patient-reported outcomes; qualitative research; symptom domains; ulcerative colitis

Funding

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR000042] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [K08 DK080172] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background It has been assumed that the symptoms measured in disease activity indices for ulcerative colitis reflect those symptoms that patients find useful in evaluating the severity of a disease flare. Objective We aimed to identify which symptoms are important to patients and to compare these symptoms with a comprehensive list of commonly measured symptoms to evaluate whether the patient-reported important symptoms are represented in current disease activity indices for ulcerative colitis. Methods Qualitative focus group study. Results Patients in this sample confirmed 15 symptoms but not 11 other symptoms found in common ulcerative colitis activity indices. Patients identified an additional 14 symptoms not included in commonly used ulcerative colitis activity indices, which they believed to be important in evaluating the onset or severity of an ulcerative colitis flare. Conclusion Current indices capture only a portion of the clinical symptoms that are important to patients in an ulcerative colitis flare, and may neither accurately measure nor fully reflect patients' experience of ulcerative colitis. These findings present an opportunity to develop better patient-centered measures of ulcerative colitis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 21:558-564 (c) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available