4.6 Article

Gestational age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories misclassify pregnant women's thyroid status: comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 170, Issue 2, Pages 329-339

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-13-0672

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Musikforlaeggerne Agnes og Knut Morks Foundation
  2. Danish Council for Independent Research: Medical Sciences
  3. Ministry of Social Affairs
  4. Axel Muusfeldt's Foundation
  5. Videnskabsminister Erna Hamilton Foundation
  6. Director Ib Henriksen Foundation
  7. Snedkermester Sophus Jacobsen og hustru Astrid Jacobsens Foundation
  8. Faculty of Medical Science's Foundation
  9. Frimodt-Heineke Foundation
  10. Torben and Alice Frimodt's Foundation
  11. Augustinus Foundation
  12. Danish Medical Association's Foundation
  13. Doctor Soren Segel and Johanne Wiibroe Segel's Foundation
  14. Illum Foundation
  15. A P Moller Foundation for the Advancement of Medical Science
  16. Arvid Nilsson Foundation
  17. Gangsted Foundation
  18. Helsefonden
  19. Elsass Foundation
  20. Familien Hede Nielsens Foundation
  21. Copenhagen University Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: Correct interpretation of thyroid status during pregnancy is vital to secure fetal development. Pregnancy-related changes in maternal thyroid status necessitate the use of gestational age-specific reference ranges. In this study, we investigated between-laboratory reproducibility of thyroid reference ranges in pregnant women. Design: Comparison of two longitudinal prospective cohort studies including 255 (cohort 1) and 101 (cohort 2) healthy antibody-negative Danish pregnant women attending prenatal care at Copenhagen University Hospital. Methods: Different immunoassays were used to measure thyroid hormone levels in the two cohorts. Thyroid hormone reference ranges were established for every 5 weeks of gestation. Differences between cohorts were explored through mixed-model repeated measures regression analyses. By applying reference ranges from one cohort to the other, the proportion of women who would be misclassified by doing so was investigated. Results: TSH increased and free thyroxine (FT4) decreased as pregnancy progressed. Results indicated highly significant differences between cohorts in free triiodothyronine (F=21.3, P<0.001) and FT4 (F=941, P<0.001). TSH levels were comparable (P=0.09). Up to 90.3% of the women had FT4 levels outside their laboratory's nonpregnant reference range, and up to 100% outside the other cohort's gestational-age-specific reference ranges. Z-score-based reference ranges markedly improved comparison between cohorts. Conclusion: Even in the same region, the use of gestational-age-specific reference ranges from different laboratories led to misclassification. Up to 100% of maternal FT4 levels fell outside the other cohort's reference range despite similar TSH levels. In clinical practice, thyroid testing of pregnant women without adding method specificity to gestational age-dependent reference ranges will compromise patient safety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available