4.6 Article

Low-dose estrogen combined oral contraceptives may negatively influence physiological bone mineral density acquisition during adolescence

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 166, Issue 6, Pages 1003-1011

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-11-1047

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim was to evaluate changes of bone mineral density (BMD) and markers of bone turnover in healthy adolescents, and in adolescent users of combined oral contraceptives (COCs) with different ethinylestradiol (EE) contents. Methods: In this prospective crossover study, 56 healthy females (15-19.5 years) with desire to use hormonal contraception were randomized to COC with either 30 or 15 mu g of EE in crossover design of 9-month intervention each in reverse order. Nonusers of the same age (n=28) served as controls. BMD at lumbar spine (LS), total femur, femoral neck, distal radius, and total body, and serum markers (N-propeptide of type I procollagen, and type I collagen C-telopeptide) were measured at baseline and after 9 and 18 months. Results: In COC nonusers, BMD significantly increased at LS and radius, while markers decreased. In COC users, BMD did not increase, with the exception of LS BMD in the 30 mu g COC group (P<0.05). In the crossover design, a difference between the low-and very low-dose COC users was found in LS BMD changes (P<0.05), where increase in BMD was more impaired in the 15 mu g COC users. The skeletal effects of COC remained significant after adjustments for age and smoking status. Markers declined faster in COC users during the first period, while they remained stable or even increased during the second 9 months. Conclusion: Physiological acquisition of LS BMD during adolescent age may be prevented by use of COC, especially those containing very low dose of EE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available