4.6 Review

GH replacement therapy in elderly GH-deficient patients: a systematic review

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 164, Issue 5, Pages 657-665

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-10-1170

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Recombinant human GH (rhGH) is prescribed for the treatment of adults with GH deficiency (GHD). However, conflicting data are available on the efficacy of rhGH treatment in elderly GHD patients. Objective: To assess the efficacy of rhGH treatment in elderly GHD subjects. Methods: We searched the available literature in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE. Study selection: Studies on GHD patients, aged > 60 years, treated with rhGH were eligible for inclusion. Data extraction was performed by two reviewers independently. Results: We found 11 eligible studies with a total of 534 patients. Only two studies had prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study designs of rhGH treatment with a duration of 6 (n = 15) and 12 months (n = 62), respectively. Treatment with rhGH decreased total and low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels by 4-8 and 11-16%, respectively, but did not alter high density lipoprotein or triglyceride levels. RhGH did not affect body mass index, but decreased waist circumference (by similar to 3 cm) and waist/hip ratio. RhGh did not consistently affect blood pressure or bone mineral density. RhGH increased lean body mass by 2-5% and decreased total fat mass by 7-10% in four studies, but did not affect body composition in two other studies. RhGH consistently improved quality of life (QoL) parameters reflected in AGHDA-scores. There were no explicit data on elderly GHD patients aged > 80 years. Conclusion: RhGH replacement in elderly subjects with GHD decreases LDL cholesterol levels and improves QoL, but the effects on other parameters are not unequivocal. There were no data on the efficacy and safety of rhGH treatment in octogenarians with GHD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available