4.6 Article

Patients with primary hyperparathyroidism have lower circulating sclerostin levels than euparathyroid controls

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 163, Issue 5, Pages 833-837

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-10-0699

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EC [TALOS: Health-F2-2008-201099]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: In vitro and in vivo studies in animal models have shown that parathyroid hormone (PTH) inhibits the expression of the SOST gene, which encodes sclerostin, an osteocyte-derived negative regulator of bone formation. We tested the hypothesis that chronic PTH excess decreases circulating sclerostin in humans. Design: We studied 25 patients with elevated serum PTH concentrations due to primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and 49 patients cured from PHPT after successful parathyroidectomy (PTx; euparathyroid controls (EuPTH)). Methods: We measured plasma PTH and serum sclerostin levels and the serum markers of bone turnover alkaline phosphatase, P1NP, and beta-CTX. Results: As expected by the design of the study, mean plasma PTH was significantly higher(P<0.001) in PHPT patients (15.3 pmol/l; 95% confidence interval (CI): 11.1-19.5) compared with that of EuPTH controls (4.1 pmol/l; 95% CI: 3.6-4.5). PHPT patients had significantly lower serum sclerostin values compared with those in EuPTH subjects (30.5 pg/ml; 95% CI: 26.0-35.1 vs 45.4 pg/ml; 95% CI: 40.5-50.2; P<0.001) and healthy controls (40.0 pg/ml; 95% CI: 37.1-42.9; P=0.01). Plasma PTH concentrations were negatively correlated with serum sclerostin values (r=-0.44; P<0.001). Bone turnover markers were significantly correlated with PTH, but not with sclerostin. Conclusion: Patients with PHPT have significantly lower serum sclerostin values compared with PTx controls with normal PTH concentrations. The negative correlation between PTH and sclerostin suggests that SOST is downregulated by PTH in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available