4.6 Article

Merits and pitfalls of mifepristone in Cushing's syndrome

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 160, Issue 6, Pages 1003-1010

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-09-0098

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Mifepristone is the only available glucocorticoid receptor antagonist. Only few adult Patients with hypercortisolism were treated to date by this drug. Our objective was to determine effectiveness and tolerability of mifepristone in Cushing's syndrome (CS). Design: Retrospective study of patients treated in seven European centers. Methods: Twenty patients with malignant (n=15, 12 with adrenocortical carcinoma, three with ectopic ACTH secretion) or benign (n=5, four with Cushing's disease. one with bilateral adrenal hyperplasia) CS were treated with rnifepristone. Mifepristone was initiated with a median starting close of 400 mg/day (200-1000). Median treatment duration was 2 months (0.25-2.1) for malignant CS. and 6 months (0.5-24) for benign CS. Clinical (signs of hypercortisolism, blood pressure, signs of adrenal insufficiency). and biochemical parameters (serum potassium and glucose) were evaluated. Results: Treatment was stopped in one patient after 1 week due to severe uncontrolled hypokalemia. Improvement of clinical signs was observed in 11/15 patients with malignant CS (73%,), and 4/5 patients with benign CS (80%). Psychiatric symptoms improved in 4/5 patients within the first week. Blood glucose levels improved in 4/7 patients. Signs of adrenal insufficiency were observed in 3/20 patients. Moderate to severe hypokalemia was observed in 11/20 patients and increased blood pressure levels in 3/20 patients. Conclusion: Mifepristone is a rapidly effective treatment of hypercortisolism, but requires close monitoring of potentially severe hypokalemia, hypertension, and clinical signs of adrenal insufficiency. Mifepristone provides a valuable treatment option in patients with severe CS when surgery is unsuccessful or impossible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available