4.6 Article

Successful use of weekly pegvisomant administration in patients with acromegaly

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 161, Issue 1, Pages 21-25

Publisher

BIOSCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0990

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Clinical trials using 80 mg once weekly pegvisomant (pegV) in active acromegaly led to a 30% fall in serum IGF1. Subsequent studies demonstrated that daily administration of up to 40 mg/day achieved an IGF1 within reference range in 97% of patients. PegV has a half-life of >70 h Suggesting weekly (losing may be possible but using higher closes than in the initial trials. Objective: To determine the efficacy of weekly dosing of pegV Design: A two center. open-label prospective study in patients with acromegaly converted front it stable daily dose of pegV (median dose 15 mg daily (range 10-20 mg od), IGF1 normal for 3 months prior to inclusion) to twice-weekly (week 0-16) followed by once-weekly (week 16-32) administration. Results: Seven patients (4M, age 57 +/- 7),cars. 6/7 prior transsphenoidal surgery. 7/7 prior radiotherapy) were recruited. Six patients completed the twice-weekly and five patients both the twice-weekly and once-weekly administration. Headaches led to two patient withdrawals at 0+24 weeks. Mean pre-dose serum IGF1. levels remained stable with the different administration regimens (IGF1 baseline 145 +/- 39 ng/ml, twice-weekly 124 +/- 39 ng/ml and once-weekly 127 +/- 22 ng/ml) and all values were within age adjusted IGF1 reference range. PegV dose Was reduced in two patients and five opted to Continue weekly administration at. trial termination. Safety and quality of life parameters remained stable. Conclusions: Twice and once-weekly administration of pegV is effective in controlling serum IGH1 levels in acromegaly and although not formally assessed, continuation of weekly closing in five patients at study conclusion suggests patient preference for this regimen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available