4.6 Article

Increased aortic root diameters in patients with acromegaly

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY
Volume 159, Issue 2, Pages 97-103

Publisher

BIO SCIENTIFICA LTD
DOI: 10.1530/EJE-08-0138

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development [92003423]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: The clinical manifestations of acromegalic cardiomyopathy include arrhythmias, valvular regurgitation. concentric left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy and LV systolic and diastolic dysfunction. At present. it is Unknown whether acromegaly also affects the aortic root. Design: Aortic root diameters were prospectively assessed in 37 acromegalic patients (18 patients with active disease and 19 with controlled disease) by conventional two-dimensional all Doppler echocardiography before, and after, an observation period of 1.9 years (range 1.5-3.0 years). Baseline parameters were compared with healthy controls. Results: The diameters of the aortic root at the sino-tubular junction and the ascending aorta were increased in patients with acromegaly: 30 +/- 4 vs 26 +/- 3 mm (P=0.0001) and 33 +/- 5 vs 30 +/- 4 mm (P=0.006) respectively The diameter of the aortic root. at. the aortic annulus and aortic sinus were not different from controls. During follow-up. the aortic root diameters increased at the levels of the annulus and the sino-tubular junction (P=0.025 and P=0.024 respectively), whereas there was no change in the diameters at. the levels of the sinus and the ascending aorta during follow-up. Baseline aortic root diameters were not influenced by disease duration, current disease activity or blood pressure. When patients with active and inactive disease were analyzed separately. only the diameter of the sinotubular junction increased in patients with inactive acromegaly during follow-up (P=0.03.1.). Conclusion: Aortic root diameters arc increased in patients with acromegaly compared with healthy controls.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available