4.0 Article

The effect of mirabegron, a potent and selective β3-adrenoceptor agonist, on the pharmacokinetics of CYP2D6 substrates desipramine and metoprolol

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER FRANCE
DOI: 10.1007/s13318-013-0133-1

Keywords

Mirabegron; Metoprolol; Desipramine; CYP2D6; beta(3)-adrenoceptor; Overactive bladder

Funding

  1. Astellas Pharma Europe

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mirabegron is a potent and selective beta(3)-adrenoceptor agonist developed for the treatment of overactive bladder. In vitro studies demonstrated that mirabegron partly acts as a (quasi-) irreversible, metabolism-dependent inhibitor of CYP2D6. The effect of steady-state mirabegron on single doses of the sensitive CYP2D6 substrates metoprolol (100 mg) and desipramine (50 mg) was assessed in two open-label, one-sequence crossover studies in healthy subjects (CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers). Mirabegron 160 mg/day increased metoprolol maximum plasma concentration (C (max)) 1.90-fold (90 % confidence interval [CI] 1.54; 2.33) and total exposure (AUC(0-a)) 3.29-fold (90 % CI 2.70; 4.00) in 12 males (study 1). Mean metoprolol half-life increased from 2.96 to 4.11 h. alpha-Hydroxymetoprolol C (max) and AUC to last measurable concentration decreased 2.6-fold and 2.2-fold, respectively. In study 2, mirabegron 100 mg/day increased desipramine C (max) 1.79-fold (90 % CI 1.69; 1.90) and AUC(0-a) 3.41-fold (90 % CI 3.07; 3.80) in 14 males and 14 females. Mean desipramine half-life increased from 19.5 to 35.8 h. C (max) of 2-hydroxydesipramine decreased similar to twofold, while AUC increased similar to 1.3-fold. Desipramine was administered again 2 weeks after the last mirabegron dose. Desipramine C (max) and AUC(0-a) were still similar to 1.13-fold increased; the 90 % CIs fell within the 0.80-1.25 interval. All treatments were well tolerated. In conclusion, mirabegron is a moderate CYP2D6 inhibitor (ratio and 90 % CI < 5.0).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available