4.5 Review

Fruit and vegetable intake and type 2 diabetes: EPIC-InterAct prospective study and meta-analysis

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 66, Issue 10, Pages 1082-1092

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2012.85

Keywords

fruit; vegetables; type 2 diabetes mellitus; epidemiology; meta-analysis; review

Funding

  1. EU FP6 programme [LSHM_CT_2006_037197]
  2. NL Agency [IGE05012]
  3. Incentive Grant from the Board of the UMC Utrecht
  4. Swedish Research Council
  5. Novo Nordisk
  6. Swedish Diabetes Association
  7. Swedish Heart-Lung Foundation
  8. German Cancer Aid
  9. Cancer Research UK
  10. Health Research Fund (FIS) of the Spanish Ministry of Health
  11. Murcia Regional Government [6236]
  12. Danish Cancer Society
  13. Compagnia di San Paolo
  14. Asturias Regional Government
  15. Vasterboten County Council
  16. UMC Utrecht
  17. Dutch Ministry of Public Health, Welfare and Sports
  18. LK Research Funds
  19. Dutch Prevention Funds
  20. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland)
  21. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  22. Statistics Netherlands
  23. AIRE-ONLUS Ragusa
  24. AVIS-Ragusa
  25. Sicilian Regional Government
  26. Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre
  27. Medical Research Council [MC_U106179471, MC_UP_A100_1003] Funding Source: researchfish
  28. MRC [MC_UP_A100_1003] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fruit and vegetable intake (FVI) may reduce the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the epidemiological evidence is inconclusive. The aim of this study is to examine the prospective association of FVI with T2D and conduct an updated meta-analysis. In the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer-InterAct (EPIC-InterAct) prospective case-cohort study nested within eight European countries, a representative sample of 16 154 participants and 12 403 incident cases of T2D were identified from 340 234 individuals with 3.99 million person-years of follow-up. For the meta-analysis we identified prospective studies on FVI and T2D risk by systematic searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE until April 2011. In EPIC-InterAct, estimated FVI by dietary questionnaires varied more than twofold between countries. In adjusted analyses the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) comparing the highest with lowest quartile of reported intake was 0.90 (0.80-1.01) for FVI; 0.89 (0.76-1.04) for fruit and 0.94 (0.84-1.05) for vegetables. Among FV subtypes, only root vegetables were inversely associated with diabetes 0.87 (0.77-0.99). In meta-analysis using pooled data from five studies including EPIC-InterAct, comparing the highest with lowest category for FVI was associated with a lower relative risk of diabetes (0.93 (0.87-1.00)). Fruit or vegetables separately were not associated with diabetes. Among FV subtypes, only green leafy vegetable (GLV) intake (relative risk: 0.84 (0.74-0.94)) was inversely associated with diabetes. Subtypes of vegetables, such as root vegetables or GLVs may be beneficial for the prevention of diabetes, while total FVI may exert a weaker overall effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available