4.5 Article

Total dietary carbohydrate, sugar, starch and fibre intakes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages S37-S60

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.74

Keywords

dietary carbohydrates; dietary sugars; dietary starch; dietary fibre; EPIC; 24-h dietary recall

Funding

  1. European Commission
  2. Ligue contre le Cancer (France)
  3. Societe 3M (France)
  4. Mutuelle Generale de l'Education Nationale
  5. Institut National de la Santeet de la Recherche Medicale (INSERM)
  6. Institut Gustave Roussy
  7. German Cancer Aid
  8. German Cancer Research Center
  9. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
  10. Danish Cancer Society
  11. Health Research Fund (FIS
  12. Spanish Ministry of Health
  13. Spanish Regional Governments of Andalucia, Asturias
  14. Basque Country, Murcia and Navarra and the Catalan Institute of Oncology
  15. ISCIII RETIC Spain [RD06/0020]
  16. Cancer Research UK
  17. Medical Research Council, UK
  18. Stroke Association, UK
  19. British Heart Foundation
  20. Department of Health, UK
  21. Food Standards Agency, UK
  22. Wellcome Trust, UK
  23. Greek Ministry of Health
  24. Hellenic Health Foundation
  25. Italian Association for Research on Cancer
  26. Italian National Research Council, Regione Sicilia (Sicilian government
  27. Associazione Iblea per la Ricerca Epidemiologica-ONLUS (Hyblean association for epidemiological research, NPO)
  28. Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport
  29. Dutch Prevention Funds
  30. LK Research Funds
  31. Dutch ZON (Zorg Onderzoek Nederland)
  32. World Cancer Research Fund (WCRF)
  33. Swedish Cancer Society
  34. Swedish Research Council
  35. Regional Government of Skane and the County Council of Vasterbotten, Sweden
  36. Norwegian Cancer Society
  37. the Norwegian Research Council and the Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation
  38. University of Sydney, a Research Scholar
  39. Cancer Institute NSW
  40. NHMRC Public Health Research Australia [520018]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To describe dietary carbohydrate intakes and their food sources among 27 centres in 10 countries participating in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. Methods: Between 1995 and 2000, 36 034 subjects, aged between 35-74 years, were administered a standardized, 24-h dietary recall using a computerized interview software programme (EPIC-SOFT). Intakes (g/day) of total carbohydrate, sugars, starch and fibre were estimated using the standardized EPIC Nutrient Database (ENDB). Mean intakes were adjusted for age, total energy intake, height and weight, and were weighted by season and day of recall. Results: Adjusted mean total carbohydrate intakes were highest in Italy and in the UK health-conscious cohort, and were lowest in Spain, Greece and France. Total fibre intakes were highest in the UK health-conscious cohort and lowest in Sweden and the UK general population. Bread contributed the highest proportion of carbohydrates (mainly starches) in every centre. Fruit consumption contributed a greater proportion of total carbohydrates (mainly sugars) among women than among men, and in southern centres compared with northern centres. Bread, fruits and vegetables represented the largest sources of fibre, but food sources varied considerably between centres. In stratified analyses, carbohydrate intakes tended to be higher among subjects who were physically active, never-smokers or non-drinkers of alcohol. Conclusions: Dietary carbohydrate intakes and in particular their food sources varied considerably between these 10 European countries. Intakes also varied according to gender and lifestyle factors. These data will form the basis for future aetiological analyses of the role of dietary carbohydrates in influencing health and disease. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2009) 63, S37-S60; doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2009.74

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available