4.6 Article

High levels of circulating cell-free DNA are a biomarker of active SLE

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eci.13015

Keywords

anti-dsDNA antibodies; circulating cell-free DNA; inflammation; SLE disease activity index; systemic lupus erythematosus

Funding

  1. Chinese National High Technology Research and Development Program, Ministry of Science and Technology [2012AA02A513]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81270717, 81490743]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background High levels of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) have been reported in patients with inflammatory conditions. The aim of the study was to investigate the levels of cfDNA in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Materials and methods Results Comparative groups comprised 22 nonpregnant and 36 pregnant women with SLE (test groups) and 60 nonpregnant and 199 pregnant women with no history of SLE (control groups). The levels of cfDNA in plasma were quantitated by a fluorometric dsDNA assay. Compared to controls, the median levels of cfDNA were significantly higher in nonpregnant SLE patients (7.38 ng/mL vs 4.6 ng/mL, P = 0.033) and in pregnant SLE patients (7.65 ng/mL vs 5.25 ng/mL, P = 0.003). Based on SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) scores, the median cfDNA levels were significantly higher in patients with active disease (4 SLEDAI < 15) compared with patients with inactive disease (SLEDAI < 4) (13.58 ng/mL vs 6.72 ng/mL, P = 0.01). While there was a trend of increased cfDNA levels with higher SLEDAI scores (R-2 = 0.3, P < 0.001), we found no association of increased cfDNA levels with nephritis, skin manifestations, multiorgan inflammations or with other inflammatory markers such as decreased C3 and C4 levels or increased anti-ds DNA antibodies. Conclusions Our results suggest that in addition to classical SLE serological markers, measurement of circulating plasma cfDNA levels has potential as a useful biomarker for assessing SLE disease activity in patients and monitoring treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available