4.6 Article

Assessment of the human faecal microbiota: II. Reproducibility and associations of 16S rRNA pyrosequences

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 855-863

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2012.02659.x

Keywords

Alpha diversity; bacterial phylogenetics; beta diversity; body mass index; medications; microbiome

Funding

  1. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health [Z01-CP010214]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Eur J Clin Invest 2012; Abstract Background: We conducted a pilot study of reproducibility and associations of microbial diversity and composition in faecal microbial DNA. Methods and results: Participants (25 men and 26 women, aged 1765 years) provided questionnaire data and multiple samples of one stool collected with two Polymedco and two Sarstedt devices preloaded with RNAlater. 16S rRNA genes in each faecal DNA aliquot were amplified, sequenced (Roche/454 Life Sciences) and assigned to taxa. Devices were compared for ease of use and reproducibility [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)] between duplicate aliquots on diversity and taxonomic assignment. Associations were tested by linear regression. Both collection devices were easy to use. Both alpha diversity (Shannon index) and beta diversity (UniFrac) were higher between than within duplicates (P = 10-8) and did not differ significantly by device (P = 0.62). Reproducibility was good (ICC=0.77) for alpha diversity and taxonomic assignment to the most abundant phyla, Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes (71.5% and 25.0% of sequences, respectively), but reproducibility was low (ICC=0.48) for less abundant taxa. Alpha diversity was lower with nonantibiotic prescription medication (P = 0.02), with younger age (P = 0.03) and marginally with higher body mass index (P = 0.08). Conclusions: With sampling from various parts of a stool, both devices provided good reproducibility on overall microbial diversity and classification for the major phyla, but not for minor phyla. Implementation of these methods should provide insights into how broad microbial parameters, but not necessarily rare microbes, affect risk of various conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available