4.5 Review

The phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent glucose-phosphotransferase system from Escherichia coli K-12 as the center of a network regulating carbohydrate flux in the cell

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 9, Pages 711-720

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2011.04.002

Keywords

Bacterial phosphotransferase system; PIS; Glucose; Carbohydrate transport; Integral membrane protein; Gene regulation; Catabolite repression; Metabolic balance; Modeling; ptsG; Mlc; MtfA; SgrT

Categories

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [SFB421]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ0315285A, FKZ0315285C]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The phosphoenolpyruvate-(PEP)-dependent-carbohydrate:phosphotransferase systems (PTSs) of enteric bacteria constitute a complex transport and sensory system. Such a PTS usually consists of two cytoplasmic energy-coupling proteins, Enzyme I (El) and HPr, and one of more than 20 different carbohydrate-specific membrane proteins named Enzyme II (Ell), which catalyze the uptake and concomitant phosphorylation of numerous carbohydrates. The most prominent representative is the glucose-PTS, which uses a PTS-typical phosphcrylation cascade to transport and phosphorylate glucose. All components of the glucose-PTS interact with a large number of non-PTS proteins to regulate the carbohydrate flux in the bacterial cell. Several aspects of the glucose-PTS have been intensively investigated in various research projects of many groups. In this article we will review our recent findings on a Glc-PTS-dependent metalloprotease, on the interaction of EIICBGlc with the regulatory peptide SgrT, on the structure of the membrane spanning C-domain of the glucose transporter and on the modeling approaches of ptsG regulation, respectively, and discuss them in context of general PTS research. (C) 2011 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available