4.4 Article

A typology of heart failure self-care management in non-elders

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING
Volume 7, Issue 3, Pages 171-181

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2007.11.005

Keywords

Heart failure; Self-care; Cognition; Attitudes; Self-efficacy; Typology

Funding

  1. SIGMA Theta Tau International
  2. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health [T420H0087428-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Heart failure (HF) self-care is extremely challenging and few people master it. Self-care was defined as an active, cognitive process in which persons engage for the purpose of maintaining their health (maintenance) and managing symptoms (management). Aim: To examine the contribution of attitudes, self-efficacy, and cognition to HF self-care management. Methods: In this mixed methods study, 41 individuals (63.4% male, 68.3% Caucasian, mean age 49.17 (10.51) years, 58.5% NYHA III, median ejection fraction 30%) were interviewed and completed instruments on HF self-care, cognition, and physical functioning. Content analysis of narrative data revealed themes of self-care management practices, attitudes and self-efficacy towards self-care. Non-parametric tests assessed differences based on the types identified in the content analysis. Results: A self-care typology was constructed from the data: experts, novices and inconsistent. There were statistically significant differences (p=0.001) in self-care practices among types and variance in attitudes, self-efficacy, and cognition. Experts had experience and skill in self-care, which novices lacked, and positive attitudes and self-efficacy that aligned with their behaviors. Most patients (71%) were classified as inconsistent, a self-care type associated with impaired cognition, poor physical functioning, negative attitudes, and poor self-efficacy. Conclusions: This typology provides insight into how expertise in self-care develops and the reasons why it is not always sustained. (C) 2007 European Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available