4.6 Article

Preoperative anaemia is a risk factor for mortality and morbidity following aortic valve surgery

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 1051-1056

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt143

Keywords

Preoperative anaemia; Aortic valve replacement; Mortality; Morbidity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The impact of anaemia on patients undergoing aortic valve surgery has not been well studied. We sought to evaluate the effect of anaemia on early outcomes following aortic valve replacement (AVR). All patients undergoing non-emergent aortic valve surgery (n = 2698) with or without other concomitant procedures between 1997 and 2010 were included. Preoperative anaemia was defined as per World Health Organization guidelines as haemoglobin (Hb) < 130 g/l in men and Hb < 120 g/l in women. Multivariable analyses were used to determine the association between preoperative anaemia and postoperative outcomes. The prevalence of preoperative anaemia was 32.2%. Patients with anaemia were older (71 +/- 12 vs 66 +/- 13 years, P < 0.001), more likely to have urgent surgery, recent MI, higher creatinine level and impaired preoperative left ventricular function. Overall unadjusted mortality was 2.8% in non-anaemic patients vs 8% in anaemic patients. Anaemic patients were more likely to require renal replacement therapy (11 vs 3%, P < 0.0001) and prolonged ventilation (24 vs 10%, P < 0.0001). Following multivariable adjustment, lower preoperative Hb was an independent predictor of mortality (odds ratio 1.19, 95% CI: 1.04-1.34, P = 0.007) and composite morbidity (odds ratio 1.36, 95% CI: 1.05-1.77, P = 0.02) after AVR. Mortality and composite morbidity were significantly higher with lower levels of preoperative Hb. Preoperative anaemia is a common finding in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery and is an important and potentially modifiable risk factor for postoperative morbidity and mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available