4.4 Article

End-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal condition

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 623-633

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2012.01347.x

Keywords

cancer; communication; end of life; patients preferences; place of death; prognostic disclosure

Funding

  1. Fondazione LU.VI. (Luogo di Vita e di Incontro) Onlus

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MICCINESI G., BIANCHI E., BRUNELLI C. & BORREANI C. (2012) European Journal of Cancer Care 21, 623-633 End-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal condition The aim of the present study is to describe end-of-life preferences of advanced cancer patients willing to talk about death issues. Eighty-eight advanced cancer patients were interviewed through End of Life Preferences Interview (ELPI), a 23-item interview covering a wide range of end-of-life care issues. Most interviewed subjects were home care patients and their median survival after ELPI administration was 69 days. In total, 100% of responders expressed the will to receive some kind of information on the disease process and/or the treatments proposed. Approximately 77% declared to be willing to talk about what it is important at the end of life in case of worsening of their conditions and 31% prefer to be left alone in difficult moments. Approximately 67% choose home as the preferred place of death and 63% think it is preferable to die in a state of unconsciousness induced by drugs. About half of responders declare to believe in any kind of life after death and 40% consider very important to find any meaning at the end of life. ELPI can be a useful instrument to adapt the model of care to the specific needs and values of each patient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available