4.4 Article

Cancer survivors' experiences of discharge from hospital follow-up

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 390-397

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01312.x

Keywords

cancer follow-up; hospital discharge; long-term cancer survivors

Funding

  1. Cancer Research UK [C23140/A8854]
  2. Thames Valley Primary Care Research Partnership [3803]
  3. Oxford Cancer Intelligence Unit
  4. Northern Cancer Registry and Information Service
  5. Yorkshire Cancer Registry and Information Service

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Discharge from hospital follow-up is a key time point in the cancer journey. With recommendations for earlier discharge of cancer survivors, attention to the discharge process is likely to become increasingly important. This study explored cancer survivors' experiences of discharge from hospital follow-up. Survivors of breast, colorectal and prostate cancer (n = 1275), 5-16 years post diagnosis were approached to take part in a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire included questions about discharge status, provision of time/information prior to discharge, feelings at discharge and satisfaction with how discharge was managed. Completed questionnaires were returned by 659 survivors (51.7%). Approximately one-third of respondents were not discharged from follow-up 5-16 years post diagnosis. Of those discharged, a substantial minority reported insufficient time (27.9%), information (24.5-45.0%) or adverse emotions (30.9%) at the time of discharge. However, 90.6% of respondents reported satisfaction with how discharge from hospital follow-up was managed. Despite high levels of satisfaction, discharge of cancer survivors from hospital follow-up could be improved with the provision of additional time, information and support. Better structuring of the final hospital appointment or a review appointment in primary care at this time could help to ensure that discharge from hospital follow-up is managed optimally for cancer survivors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available