4.7 Article

Changes in serum hydroxyvitamin D levels of breast cancer patients during tamoxifen treatment or chemotherapy in premenopausal breast cancer patients

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 50, Issue 8, Pages 1403-1411

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.026

Keywords

Breast cancer; Tamoxifen; Chemotherapy; Vitamin D

Categories

Funding

  1. Asan Clinical Research Center grant [2010-0781]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We investigated the effect of breast cancer adjuvant treatment on vitamin D status, as measured by serum hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD). Methods: Premenopausal patients (n = 483) diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer in 2009 at Asan Medical Center had serum 25OHD levels prospectively analysed at diagnosis and 6 and 12 months after surgery. We excluded patients who took vitamin D supplements or received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Vitamin D sufficiency was defined as a serum level of >= 30 ng/ml, insufficiency as 20-29 ng/ml and deficiency as <20 ng/ml. Results: Compared with baseline serum 25OHD, patients who received chemotherapy had decreased serum 25OHD levels at 6 months (-5.52 ng/ml, p = 0.003) and 12 months (-1.24 ng/ml, p = 0.517) and patients who received anti-hormone therapy had significantly increased serum 25OHD levels at 6 months (+3.00 ng/ml, p = 0.681) and 12 months (+6.47 ng/ml, p = 0.002, respectively). Among patients who received chemotherapy, 49.5% were vitamin D sufficient at diagnosis but only 26.9% were sufficient 6 months after finishing chemotherapy and this percentage increased to 45.2% at 12 months. Conclusions: Vitamin D levels decrease during chemotherapy but recover after treatment ends. Anti-hormone therapy with tamoxifen causes serum vitamin D levels to increase. Whether the increased serum vitamin D affects the antitumour effect of the tamoxifen has yet to be determined. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available