4.7 Article

Complying with the European Clinical Trials directive while surviving the administrative pressure - An alternative approach to toxicity registration in a cancer trial

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 251-259

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.09.027

Keywords

Acute lymphoblastic leukaemia; Clinical trial; Chemotherapy; Children; Toxicity; Registration

Categories

Funding

  1. Danish Childhood Cancer Foundation
  2. Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The European Clinical Trials Directive of 2004 has increased the amount of paper work and reduced the number of initiated clinical trials. Particularly multinational trials have been delayed. To meet this challenge we developed a novel, simplified, fast and easy strategy for on-line toxicity registration for patients treated according to the Nordic/Baltic acute lymphoblastic leukaemia protocol, NOPHO ALL 2008, for children and young adults, including three randomisations. We used a risk-assessment based approach, avoiding reporting of expected adverse events and instead concentrating on 20 well-known serious, but rarer events with focus on changes in therapy introduced in the treatment protocol. This toxicity registration strategy was approved by the relevant regulatory authorities in all seven countries involved, as compliant within the EU directive of 2004. The centre compliance to registration was excellent with 98.9% of all patients being registered within 5 weeks from the requested quarterly registration. Currently, four toxicities (thrombosis, fungal infections, pancreatitis and allergic reactions) have been chosen for further detailed exploration due to the cumulative fraction of patients with positive registrations exceeding 5%. This toxicity registration offers real-time toxicity profiles of the total study cohort and provides early warnings of specific toxicities that require further investigation. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available