4.4 Article

General Practitioners Recognizing Alcohol Dependence: A Large Cross-Sectional Study in 6 European Countries

Journal

ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 28-32

Publisher

ANNALS FAMILY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.1370/afm.1742

Keywords

alcoholism; alcohol dependence; DSM-IV; general practitioner; primary healthcare; therapy

Funding

  1. GWT-TUD (Gesellschaft fur Wissens -und Technologietransfer der TU Dresden mbH - company with limited liabilities for transferring knowledge and technology of the Dresden University of Technology) by Lundbeck
  2. Lundbeck
  3. Osservatorio Permanente Giovani e Alcool, Roma, Italy
  4. DA Pharma
  5. Teva
  6. AbbiVie
  7. Reckitt Benckiser (RB)
  8. GWT-TUD
  9. AOP Orphan
  10. Berlin-Chemie
  11. Janssen
  12. Chiesi
  13. Reckitt Benckiser
  14. Sanofi Aventis
  15. Servier
  16. University of Dresden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PURPOSE Although alcohol dependence causes marked mortality and disease burden in Europe, the treatment rate is low. Primary care could play a key role in reducing alcohol-attributable harm by screening, brief interventions, and initiating or referral to treatment. This study investigates identification of alcohol dependence in European primary care settings. METHODS Assessments from 13,003 general practitioners, and 9,098 interviews (8,476 joint number of interviewed patients with a physician's assessment) were collected in 6 European countries. Alcohol dependence, comorbidities, and health service utilization were assessed by the general practitioner and independently using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) and other structured interviews. Weighted regression analyses were used to compare the impact of influencing variables on both types of diagnoses. RESULTS The rate of patients being identified as alcohol dependent by the CIDI or a general practitioner was about equally high, but there was not a lot of overlap between cases identified. Alcohol-dependent patients identified by a physician were older, had higher rates of physicial comorbidity (liver disease, hypertension), and were socially more marginalized, whereas average consumption of alcohol and mental comorbidity were equally high in both groups. CONCLUSION General practitioners were able to identify alcohol dependence, but the cases they identified differed from cases identified using the CIDI. The role of the CIDI as the reference standard should be reexamined, as older alcohol-dependent patients with severe comorbidities seemed to be missed in this assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available