4.7 Article

Quality of life analysis in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer treated first-line with cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 439-448

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.023

Keywords

Cetuximab; FOLFIRI; KRAS wild-type; Metastatic colorectal cancer; Quality of life

Categories

Funding

  1. Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In the CRYSTAL study adding cetuximab to first-line FOLFIRI significantly improved outcome in patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer. Quality of life (QoL) was assessed, and associations with tumour response and survival were investigated. Patients and methods: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL questionnaire-core 30 was used, focusing on global health status (GHS)/QoL and social functioning scales. Radiological response was assessed by an independent review committee. Results: QoL was evaluable in 627/666 patients (94%) with KRAS wild-type tumours; of these 52% received FOLFIRI, and 48% FOLFIRI plus cetuximab. Pattern mixture analysis revealed no significant differences for GHS/QoL (P = 0.12) and social functioning scores (P = 0.43) between the treatment arms. In additional analyses: early skin reactions in patients receiving cetuximab did not significantly affect these QoL scales, and tumour response was more common (58% versus 40%, P = 0.0002) and survival longer (Hazard ratio 1.68, P < 0.0001) in asymptomatic compared with symptomatic patients at baseline. Adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI was associated with significantly higher tumour response irrespective of patient baseline symptomatic status, and enhanced symptom relief from baseline in those whose tumours had responded. Conclusion: Adding cetuximab to FOLFIRI improved response rate and survival without either improving or negatively impacting on GHS/QoL and social functioning. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available