4.7 Article

Everolimus in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Subgroup analysis of patients with 1 or 2 previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapies enrolled in the phase III RECORD-1 study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 48, Issue 3, Pages 333-339

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.11.027

Keywords

Metastatic RCC; Everolimus; mTOR inhibitor; VEGFr-TKI; Progression-free survival; Sequential therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation
  2. Pfizer
  3. Novartis
  4. Roche
  5. GlaxoSmithKline
  6. Bayer
  7. Aveo
  8. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  9. Genentech
  10. Bayer-Schering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: In the phase III RECORD-1 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00410124), patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who progressed on previous vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (VEGFr-TKI) therapy were randomised 2: 1 to everolimus 10 mg once daily (n = 277) or placebo (n = 139). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.9 months with everolimus and 1.9 months with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.33; P < .001). This preplanned, prospective sub-analysis evaluated PFS benefit of everolimus versus placebo in patients who had previously received 1 or 2 VEGFr-TKIs. Patients and methods: Median PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse differences in PFS. Results: All patients (100%) received >= 1 previous VEGFr-TKI; 26% of patients received 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs. Among patients who received 1 previous VEGFr-TKI, median PFS was 5.4 months with everolimus and 1.9 months with placebo (HR, 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.43; P < .001). Among patients who received 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs, median PFS was 4.0 months with everolimus and 1.8 months with placebo (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.19-0.54; P < .001). The everolimus safety profile was similar for both groups. Conclusions: Everolimus was associated with prolonged PFS relative to placebo in patients who received 1 or 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs. Patients who received only 1 previous VEGFr-TKI had apparently longer PFS with everolimus in reference to those who received 2 previous VEGFr-TKIs. These results support the use of everolimus as the standard of care in patients who fail initial VEGFr-TKI therapy. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available