4.4 Article

Repeatability of Respiratory Exchange Ratio Time Series Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF STRENGTH AND CONDITIONING RESEARCH
Volume 29, Issue 9, Pages 2550-2558

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000000924

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nelson, MT, Biltz, GR, and Dengel, DR. Repeatability of respiratory exchange ratio time series analysis. J Strength Cond Res 29(9): 2550-2558, 2015-Currently, there are few studies on the repeatability of a time series analysis of respiratory exchange ratio (RER) under the same conditions. This repeated-measures study compared 2 trials completed under the same conditions. After an 8-hour fast, subjects (7 male and 5 female) (mean +/- SD) of age 27.3 +/- 3.7 years, body weight of 71.8 +/- 8.4 kg, percent body fat of 16.4 +/- 8.1%, and peak oxygen uptake (Vo(2)peak) of 46.0 +/- 5.3 ml center dot kg(-1)center dot min(-1) completed a Vo(2)peak test followed 7 days later by a cycle ergometer test at 30% of ventilatory threshold (VT) and 60% of VT for 15 minutes each. These tests were repeated again 7 days later. Paired t-tests revealed no significant differences between the tests for mean RER or sample entropy (SampEn) score at both intensities. The coefficients of variance were generally similar for the mean and SampEn of the RER. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for the mean RER at 30% of VT were 1.00 and at 60% of VT were 0.92. The ICC values for the SampEn RER at 30% of VT were 0.81 and at 60% of VT were the lowest at 0.25. Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a measure of agreement between both methods. We demonstrated that RER measurements at 30 and 60% of VT are repeatable during steady-state cycle ergometery. Future research should determine if this finding is consistent with a larger sample size and different exercise intensities.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available