4.7 Article

Dietary carotenoids and risk of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer in a prospective cohort of Swedish women

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1079-1085

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.01.004

Keywords

beta-Carotene; Breast cancer; Carotenoids; Epidemiology; Prospective studies

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carotenoids have antioxidant and antiproliferative properties and may reduce the risk of breast cancer. We examined the association between dietary carotenoids and risk of invasive breast cancer in the Swedish Mammography Cohort, a population-based cohort of 36,664 women who completed a questionnaire in 1997. During a mean follow-up of 9.4 years, 1008 women were diagnosed with incident breast cancer. Dietary carotenoids were not significantly associated with the risk of breast cancer overall or with any subtype defined by oestrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status. However, dietary alpha-carotene and beta-carotene were inversely associated with the risk of ER-PR-breast cancer among ever smokers. Among ever smokers, the multivariable relative risks of ER-PR-breast cancer comparing the highest with the lowest quintile of intake were 0.32 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.11-0.94; P(trend) = 0.01) for alpha-carotene and 0.35 (95% Cl: 0.12-0.99; P(trend) = 0.03) for beta-carotene. The risk of breast cancer also decreased with increasing intakes of alpha-carotene (P(trend) = 0.02) and beta-carotene (P(trend) = 0.01) among women who did not use dietary supplements. These findings suggest that dietary alpha-carotene and beta-carotene are inversely associated with the risk of breast cancer among smokers and among women who do not use dietary supplements. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available