4.7 Article

Glutathione-S-transferase pi (GSTP1) codon 105 polymorphism is not associated with oxaliplatin efficacy or toxicity in advanced colorectal cancer patients

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 45, Issue 4, Pages 572-578

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.015

Keywords

Oxaliplatin; Colorectal; Neurotoxicity; Survival; Glutathione-S-transferase pi; GSTP1 Ile105Val

Categories

Funding

  1. Linda Mol
  2. datamanager IKO trial office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Oxaliplatin is detoxified by conjugation to glutathione via the enzyme Glutathione-S-transferase pi (GSTP1). The aim of this study is to investigate the association of GSTP1 Ile105Val genetic polymorphism with oxaliplatin efficacy and toxicity in advanced colorectal cancer (ACC) patients. Experimental design: A total of 91 ACC patients received capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as a part of a multicentre phase-III study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Tumour response was evaluated according to RECIST, toxicity was graded using CTC, and GSTP1 Ile105Val was determined by pyrosequencing. Results: Overall survival after CAPOX was similar for patients with the Ile/Ile (11.5 mo), Ile/Val (11.6 mo) and Val/Val (12.6 mo) genotypes (p = 0.602). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in progression-free survival (p = 0.252). Overall grades 3-4 toxicity was not related to genotype (p = 0.313). There were no differences in any grade or grades 3-4 neurotoxicity amongst the patients who received >= 500 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin (p-values of 0.376 and 0.772, respectively). Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the GSTP1 genotype is not predictive for progression-free survival or overall survival in ACC patients treated with CAPOX. Moreover, overall neurotoxicity and neurotoxicity in patients receiving >= 500 mg/m(2) of oxaliplatin was not associated with GSTP1 genotype. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available