4.7 Article

An evaluation of a preparation of Mycobacterium vaccae (SRL172) as an immunotherapeutic agent in renal cancer

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 44, Issue 2, Pages 216-223

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.11.003

Keywords

renal cell carcinoma; immunotherapy; Mycobacterium vaccae; SRL172

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Two studies were carried out to evaluate heat-killed Mycobacterium vaccae SRL172 as an immunotherapeutic agent for patients with metastatic, post- nephrectomy, renal cell carcinoma. In the first study, 60 patients in France and the UK received injections of SRL172, and their survival was compared with that of historical controls who had been treated either with biological response modifiers (IL-2, IFN-alpha) or chemotherapy in the second study, 36 patients were randomised to receive treatment with IL-2 alone or IL-2 plus SRL172. Survival and adverse events related to the treatments were assessed and compared between treatment groups. The first study showed that those treated with SRL172 alone survived equally as long as those receiving IL-2 or IFN-alpha and both treatment groups survived longer than those on chemotherapy (p < 0.001), a result supported by Cox's proportional hazards regression analysis. The second study, stopped early due to drug supply issues, showed that the addition of SRL172 to IL-2 made no difference to survival compared to IL-2 alone, in the limited numbers treated. Adverse events occurring in those receiving SRL172 in the first study were mild and in the second study those receiving IL-2 alone had significantly more adverse events than those receiving SRL172 plus IL-2 (p < 0.001). It is concluded that SRL172 may have activity in metastatic renal cancer and has very low toxicity, making it worthy of further study. (c) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available