4.4 Article

Maximal fat oxidation, but not aerobic capacity, is affected by oral contraceptive use in young healthy women

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 5, Pages 937-945

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-3075-7

Keywords

Women; Oral contraceptives; Aerobic capacity; Maximal lipid utilization; Exercise

Funding

  1. Ministere Jeunesse et Sport
  2. Federation Francaise d'Education Physique et de Gymnastique Volontaire

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic ovarian hormones contained in oral contraceptives (OC) may alter the aerobic capacity and lipid metabolism in oral contraceptive users (OC+) compared with non-users (OC-). The aim of this study was thus to investigate the differences between OC- and OC+ (1) in cardiorespiratory parameters at the anaerobic threshold (AT) and at the maximal aerobic capacity and (2) in the exercise intensity (Lipox(max)) at which lipid oxidation rate is maximal (MLOR). Twenty-one healthy untrained women (22.0 +/- A 0.6 years old) who took OC (OC+; low-dose monophasic OC, n = 11) or not (OC-; n = 10) performed two experimental exercise sessions. In the first one, cardiorespiratory parameters at the AT and at the maximal aerobic capacity were assessed during a maximal incremental exercise session. In the second one, Lipox(max) and MLOR were measured during a submaximal incremental exercise session. No significant difference was observed in cardiorespiratory parameters at the AT and at the maximal aerobic capacity between OC+ and OC- women. OC+ women showed higher MLOR (7.6 +/- A 1.9 vs 4.6 +/- A 1.0 mg min(-1) kg FFM-1; p < 0.01) that was elicited by higher Lipox(max) (45.2 +/- A 5.2 vs 36.2 +/- A 4.1 % of VO2max; p < 0.001) compared to OC- women. OC+ and OC- women did not differ in cardiorespiratory parameters at the AT and at the maximal aerobic capacity. However, OC+ women show higher MLOR and Lipox(max) compared with OC- women. The hormonal status appears to be an important MLOR and Lipox(max) determinant in untrained women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available