4.4 Article

A beat-by-beat analysis of cardiovascular responses to dry resting and exercise apnoeas in elite divers

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages 119-128

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-014-2992-9

Keywords

Heart rate; Arterial blood pressure; Cardiac output; Baroreflexes

Funding

  1. University of Brescia
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [32003B_144259]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiovascular responses during resting apnoea include three phases: (1) a dynamic phase of rapid changes, lasting at most 30 s; (2) a subsequent steady phase; and (3) a further dynamic phase, with a continuous decrease in heart rate (HR) and an increase in blood pressure. The interpretation was that the end of the steady phase corresponds to the physiological apnoea breaking point. This being so, during exercise apnoeas, the steady phase would be shorter, and the rate of cardiovascular changes in the subsequent unsteady phase would be faster than at rest. To test these hypotheses, we measured beat-by-beat systolic (SBP), diastolic, and mean blood pressures (MBP), HR, and stroke volume (SV) in six divers during dry resting (duration 239.4 +/- A 51.6 s) and exercise (30 W on cycle ergometer, duration 88.2 +/- A 20.9 s) maximal apnoeas, and we computed cardiac output () and total peripheral resistance (TPR). Compared to control, at the beginning of resting (R1) and exercising (E1) apnoeas, SBP and MBP decreased and HR increased. SV and fell, so that TPR remained unchanged. At rest, HR, SV, , and SBP were stable during the subsequent phase; this steady phase was missing in exercise apnoeas. Subsequently, at rest (R3) and at exercise (E2), HR decreased and SBP increased continuously. SV returned to control values. Since remained unchanged, TPR grew. The lack of steady phase during exercise apnoeas suggests that the conditions determining R3 were already attained at the end of E1. This being so, E2 would correspond to R3.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available