4.4 Article

Relationship between core temperature, skin temperature, and heat flux during exercise in heat

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 9, Pages 2381-2389

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2674-z

Keywords

Non-invasive measurement; Heat strain; Human; Heat transfer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the relationship between core temperature (T (c)), skin temperature (T (s)) and heat flux (HF) during exercise in hot conditions. Nine test volunteers, wearing an Army Combat Uniform and body armor, participated in three sessions at 25 A degrees C/50 % relative humidity (RH); 35 A degrees C/70 % RH; and 42 A degrees C/20 % RH. Each session consisted of two 1-h treadmill walks at similar to 350 W and similar to 540 W intensity. T (s) and HF from six sites on the forehead, sternum, pectoralis, left rib cage, left scapula, and left thigh, and T (c) (i.e., core temperature pill used as a suppository) were measured. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to derive algorithms that estimate T (c) from T (s) and HF at each site. A simple model was developed to simulate influences of thermal conductivity and thickness of the local body tissues on the relationship between T (c), T (s), and HF. Coefficient of determination (R (2)) ranged from 0.30 to 0.88, varying with locations and conditions. Good sites for T (c) measurement at surface were the sternum, and a combination of the sternum, scapula, and rib sites. The combination of T (s) and HF measured at the sternum explained similar to 75 % or more of variance in observed T (c) in hot environments. The forehead was found unsuitable for exercise in heat due to sweating and evaporative heat loss. The derived algorithms are likely applicable only for the same ensemble or ensembles with similar thermal and vapor resistances. Algorithms for T (c) measurement are location-specific and their accuracy is dependent, to a large degree, on sensor placement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available