4.4 Article

The impact of high-intensity intermittent exercise on resting metabolic rate in healthy males

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages 3039-3047

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-013-2741-5

Keywords

Interval training; EPOC; Energy expenditure; Energy balance

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Diet, Lifestyle and Physical Activity Biomedical Research Unit based at University Hospitals of Leicester and Loughborough University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-intensity intermittent exercise training (HIT) may favourably alter body composition despite low training volumes and predicted energy expenditure (EE). To characterise the acute impact of two common HIT protocols on EE and post-exercise oxygen consumption (11 h EPOC). Oxygen consumption (l min(-1)), respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and EE were measured in nine healthy, lean males over 12 h under three conditions: control (CON), HIT1 (10 x 1 min high-intensity cycling bouts followed by 1 min rest) and HIT2 (10 x 4 min high-intensity cycling bouts followed by 2 min rest). Total exercise period EE during HIT1 (1,151 +/- A 205 kJ) (mean +/- A SD) was significantly lower than HIT2 (2,788 +/- A 322 kJ; p < 0.001). EE within the 60 min after exercise was significantly albeit marginally higher after HIT1 (388 +/- A 44 kJ; p = 0.02) and HIT2 (389 +/- A 39 kJ; p = 0.01) compared with CON (329 +/- A 39 kJ), with no difference between exercise conditions (p = 0.778). RER during this period was significantly lower in HIT1 (0.78 +/- A 0.06; p = 0.011) and HIT2 (0.76 +/- A 0.04; p = 0.004) compared with CON (0.87 +/- A 0.06). During the 'slow phase' of EPOC (1.25-9.75 h), there were no significant differences in EE (p = 0.07) or RER (p = 0.173) between trials. Single HIT sessions notably increases EE during exertion; however, the influence on metabolic rate post-exercise is transient and relatively minor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available