4.4 Article

Does cerebral oxygenation affect cognitive function during exercise?

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages 1973-1982

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-011-1827-1

Keywords

Premotor time; Reaction time; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Hyperventilation

Funding

  1. Descente and Ishimoto Memorial Foundation for the Promotion of Sports Science
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [20240061, 10J10821, 11J00333] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study tested whether cerebral oxygenation affects cognitive function during exercise. We measured reaction times (RT) of 12 participants while they performed a modified version of the Eriksen flanker task, at rest and while cycling. In the exercise condition, participants performed the cognitive task at rest and while cycling at three workloads [40, 60, and 80% of peak oxygen uptake ((V) over dotO(2))]. In the control condition, the workload was fixed at 20 W. RT was divided into premotor and motor components based on surface electromyographic recordings. The premotor component of RT (premotor time) was used to evaluate the effects of acute exercise on cognitive function. Cerebral oxygenation was monitored during the cognitive task over the right frontal cortex using near-infrared spectroscopy. In the exercise condition, we found that premotor time significantly decreased during exercise at 60% peak (V) over dotO(2) relative to rest. However, this improvement was not observed during exercise at 80% peak (V) over dotO(2). In the control condition, premotor time did not change during exercise. Cerebral oxygenation during exercise at 60% peak (V) over dotO(2) was not significantly different from that at rest, while cerebral oxygenation substantially decreased during exercise at 80% peak (V) over dotO(2). The present results suggest that an improvement in cognitive function occurs during moderate exercise, independent of cerebral oxygenation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available