4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Skin cooling aids cerebrovascular function more effectively under severe than moderate heat stress

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 109, Issue 1, Pages 101-108

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1298-9

Keywords

Skin cooling; Heat stress; Cardiovascular; Brain perfusion; Orthostatic stress

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Skin surface cooling has been shown to improve orthostatic tolerance; however, the influence of severe heat stress on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular responses to skin cooling remains unknown. Nine healthy males, resting supine in a water-perfusion suit, were heated to +1.0 and +2.0A degrees C elevation in body core temperature (T (c)). Blood flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery (transcranial Doppler ultrasound), mean arterial pressure (MAP; photoplethysmography), stroke volume (SV; Modelflow), total peripheral resistance (TPR; Modelflow), heart rate (HR; ECG) and the partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) were measured continuously during 1-min baseline and 3-min lower body negative pressure (LBNP, -15 mm Hg) when heated without and again with skin surface cooling. Nine participants tolerated +1A degrees C and six participants reached +2A degrees C. Skin cooling elevated (P = 0.004) MAP similar to 4% during baseline and LBNP at +1A degrees C T (c). During LBNP, skin cooling increased SV (9%; P = 0.010) and TPR (0.9 mm Hg L-1 min, P = 0.013) and lowered HR (13 b min(-1), P = 0.012) at +1A degrees C T (c) and +2A degrees C T (c) collectively. At +2A degrees C T (c), skin cooling elevated PETCO2 similar to 4.3 mm Hg (P = 0.011) and therefore reduced cerebral vascular resistance similar to 0.1 mm Hg cm(-1) s at baseline and LBNP (P = 0.012). In conclusion, skin cooling under severe heating and mild orthostatic stress maintained cerebral blood flow more effectively than it did under moderate heating, in conjunction with elevated carbon dioxide pressure, SV and arterial resistance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available