4.4 Article

Time trial performance in normal and high ambient temperature: is there a role for 5-HT?

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 107, Issue 1, Pages 119-126

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-009-1109-3

Keywords

Central fatigue; Serotonin; Exercise; Heat; Citalopram

Funding

  1. Vrije Universiteit Brussel [OZR 990, 1235]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The original central fatigue hypothesis suggested that fatigue during prolonged exercise might be due to higher 5-HT activity. Therefore, we examined the effects of acute administration of a selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) on performance and thermoregulation. Eleven healthy trained male cyclists completed four experimental trials (two in 18A degrees C, two in 30A degrees C) in a double-blind randomised crossover design. Subjects ingested either a placebo (PLA: lactose 2 x 10 mg) or citalopram (CITAL 2 x 10 mg) on the evening before and the morning of the trial. Subjects cycled for 60 min at 55% W (max), immediately followed by a time trial (TT) to measure performance. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Acute SSRI did not significantly change performance on the TT (18A degrees C P = 0.518; 30A degrees C P = 0.112). During recovery at 30A degrees C, core temperature was significantly lower in the CITAL trial (P < 0.012). At 30A degrees C heart rate was significantly lower after exercise in CITAL (P = 0.013). CITAL significantly increased cortisol concentrations at rest (P = 0.016), after the TT (P = 0.006) and after 15-min recovery (P = 0.041) at 30A degrees C. 5-HT reuptake inhibition did not cause significant reductions in performance. Core temperature was significantly lower only after the time trial in heat after CITAL administration. The present work failed to prove whether or not 5-HT has an exclusive role in the onset of centrally mediated fatigue during prolonged exercise in both normal and high ambient temperature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available