Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Editorial Policies of Pediatric Journals Survey of Instructions for Authors
Joerg J. Meerpohl et al.
ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE (2010)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Kenneth F. Schulz et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2010)
Improvement in the Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials Among General Anesthesiology Journals 2000 to 2006: A 6-Year Follow-Up
Mary Lou V. H. Greenfield et al.
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA (2009)
The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: Survey of major general medical journals
Otavio Berwanger et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2009)
CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
Sally Hopewell et al.
LANCET (2008)
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: Explanation and elaboration
Sally Hopewell et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2008)
Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: A systematic review
Susan Armijo Olivo et al.
PHYSICAL THERAPY (2008)
Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials
J. Pildal et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2007)
Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved
Sally Hopewell et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Bias in clinical intervention research
LL Gluud
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2006)
Abstract reporting in randomized clinical trials of acute lung injury: An audit and assessment of a quality of reporting score
Karen E. A. Burns et al.
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE (2005)
An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently
E Mills et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2005)
Quality of structured abstracts of original research articles in the British Medical Journal, the Canadian Medical Association Journal and the Journal of the American Medical Association:: a 10-year follow-up study
HL Wong et al.
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION (2005)
Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group
HP Soares et al.
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)
Quality of abstracts describing randomized trials in the Proceedings of American society of Clinical Oncology meetings: Guidelines for improved reporting
MK Krzyzanowska et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY (2004)
Quality of reporting of randomized trials as a measure of methodologic quality
K Huwiler-Müntener et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials - A comparative before-and-after evaluation
D Moher et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2001)