4.7 Article

Modeling the response of rice phenology to climate change and variability in different climatic zones: Comparisons of five models

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY
Volume 45, Issue -, Pages 165-176

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eja.2012.10.005

Keywords

Climate change; Extreme temperature; Maturity date; Phenology change; Rice phenology model

Categories

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Science, China [XDA05090308, 2010CB950902]
  2. Hundred Talents Program from the Chinese Academy of Sciences

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Crop models have been widely used in simulating and predicting changes in rice phenology in the major rice production regions of China, however the uncertainties in simulating crop phenology at a large scale and from different models were rarely investigated. In the present study, five rice phenological models/modules (i.e., CERES-Rice, ORYZA2000, RCM, Beta Model, SIMRIW) were firstly calibrated and validated based on a large number of rice phenological observations across China during 1981-2009. The inner workings of the models, as well as the simulated phenological response to climate change/variability, were compared to determine if the models adequately handled climatic changes and climatic variability. Results showed these models simulated rice phenological development over a large area fairly well after calibration, although the relative performance of the models varied in different regions. The simulated changes in rice phenology were generally consistent when temperatures were below the optimum; however varied largely when temperatures were above the optimum. The simulated rice growing season under future climate scenarios was shortened by about 0.45-5.78 days; but in northeastern China, increased temperature variability may prolong the growing season of rice. We concluded more modeling and experimental studies should be conducted to accelerate understanding of rice phenology development under extreme temperatures. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available