4.7 Review

Vitamin D and cardiovascular disease: is the evidence solid?

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 34, Issue 48, Pages 3691-3698

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht166

Keywords

Vitamin D; Vascular risk factors; Cardiovascular disease

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2011-11-003] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. NHLBI NIH HHS [P20 HL113451] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Vitamin D deficiency, prevalent in 3050 of adults in developed countries, is largely due to inadequate cutaneous production that results from decreased exposure to sunlight, and to a lesser degree from low dietary intake of vitamin D. Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OH D) 20 ng/mL indicate vitamin D deficiency and levels 30 ng/mL are considered optimal. While the endocrine functions of vitamin D related to bone metabolism and mineral ion homoeostasis have been extensively studied, robust epidemiological evidence also suggests a close association between vitamin D deficiency and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Experimental studies have demonstrated novel actions of vitamin D metabolites on cardiomyocytes, and endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. Low 25-OH D levels are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy, vascular dysfunction, and reninangiotensin system activation. Despite a large body of experimental, cross-sectional, and prospective evidence implicating vitamin D deficiency in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular disease, a causal relationship remains to be established. Moreover, the cardiovascular benefits of normalizing 25-OH D levels in those without renal disease or hyperparathyroidism have not been established, and questions of an epiphenomenon where vitamin D status merely reflects a classic risk burden have been raised. Randomized trials of vitamin D replacement employing cardiovascular endpoints will provide much needed evidence for determining its role in cardiovascular protection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available