4.6 Article

Effect of leg dominance on change of direction ability amongst young elite soccer players

Journal

JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 542-548

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1129432

Keywords

Change of direction; soccer; asymmetry; strength

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Young soccer players often use one particular dominant leg (DL) to perform dynamic movements which require strength, resulting in leg asymmetry. The aim of this study was to compare, in young soccer players, the effect of using DL and non-dominant leg (NDL) on time performance of two change of direction (COD) manoeuvres in several angles of COD. Seventy-three young male soccer players (mean +/- SD, age: 16.1 +/- 1.8 year) participated in this study. Players performed 10-m sprints, either in a straight line or with a COD (5m straight ahead and a turn of 45 degrees, 90 degrees, 135 degrees and 180 degrees to the opposite side of the DL or NDL). Testing for COD speed was conducted over two different manoeuvres: (1) sidestepping and (2) bypass. Maximal isometric voluntary contraction of the knee extensors/flexors and hip abductors/adductors was also measured using a handheld dynamometer. For sidestepping, COD performance with use of the DL was significantly better compared to the NDL (P<0.05) in all angles of COD. However, bypass COD performance through use of the DL was better compared to the NDL only when turning at 135 degrees. Additionally, strength of the knee extensors/flexors and hip abductors of the DL was significantly (P<0.05) greater than the NDL. The use of the DL allows better COD performance than the NDL when sidestepping manoeuvre is used. However, the DL allows better COD performance than the NDL only at 135 degrees with the use of the bypass manoeuvre. Furthermore, the greater strength of the DL compared to the NDL may contribute to COD performance difference between legs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available