4.7 Article

Efficacy of the long-acting nitro vasodilator pentaerithrityl tetranitrate in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris receiving anti-anginal background therapy with beta-blockers: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 35, Issue 14, Pages 895-902

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht384

Keywords

Pentaerithrityl tetranitrate; Chronic stable angina; Total exercise duration; Organic nitrate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The organic nitrate pentaerithrityl tetranitrate (PETN) has been shown to have ancillary properties that prevent the development of tolerance and endothelial dysfunction. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study (CLEOPATRA study) was designed to investigate the anti-ischaemic efficacy of PETN 80 mg b.i.d. (morning and mid-day) over placebo in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris. A total of 655 patients were evaluated in the intention-to-treat population, randomized to PETN (80 mg b.i.d., n 328) or placebo (n 327) and completed the study. Patients underwent treadmill exercise tests at randomization, after 6 and 12 weeks of treatment. Treatment with PETN over 12 weeks did not modify the primary endpoint total exercise duration (TED, P 0.423). In a pre-specified sub-analysis of patients with reduced exercise capacity (TED at baseline 9 min, n 257), PETN appeared more effective than placebo treatment (P 0.054). Superiority of PETN over placebo was evident in patients who were symptomatic at low exercise levels (n 120; P 0.017). Pentaerithrityl tetranitrate 80 mg b.i.d. was well tolerated, and the overall safety profile was comparable with placebo. Although providing no additional benefit in unselected patients with known coronary artery disease, PETN therapy, administered in addition to modern anti-ischaemic therapy, could increase exercise tolerance in symptomatic patients with reduced exercise capacity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available