4.5 Article

Association between actigraphic sleep metrics and body composition

Journal

ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages 773-778

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2015.05.001

Keywords

Sleep; Actigraphy; Body mass index; Abdominal fat; Absorptiometry

Funding

  1. Coca-Cola Company
  2. Cancer Training Branch of the National Cancer Institute [K05 CA136975]
  3. NIH grant [R01HL095799]
  4. BodyMedia
  5. Technogym
  6. U.S. Department of Defense
  7. National Institutes of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Determine if individuals with poor sleep characteristics (i.e., late sleep onset or wake times, short sleep duration, long sleep latency, low sleep efficiency, high wake after sleep onset) have greater body mass index (BMI = kg/m(2)) or body fat. Methods: Data for these cross-sectional analyses were from the Energy Balance Study (University of South Carolina). Participants were between 21 and 35 years of age and had a BMI of 20 to 35 kg/m2. Body fat percent was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. Sleep and physical activity were measured by actigraphy (BodyMedia's SenseWear physical activity armband). General linear models were used to estimate mean BMI and body fat percent by sleep metric categories. Results: Greater BMI and body fat percent were associated with low sleep efficiency (BMI = 25.5 vs. 24.8 kg/m(2), P < .01; body fat = 27.7% vs. 26.5%, P = .04) and high wake after sleep onset (BMI = 25.6 vs. 25.0 kg/m(2), P = .02; body fat = 28.0% vs. 26.7%, P = .03). Elevated BMI or body fat percent also were observed for later wake times, shorter sleep duration, and longer sleep latency. Sex modified the association between wake times and body composition. Conclusions: Understanding the complex relationships between sleep and health outcomes could help reduce chronic disease burden by incorporating sleep components, measured through novel noninvasive techniques (SenseWear armband), into weight loss interventions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available