4.7 Article

Effect of vorapaxar on myocardial infarction in the thrombin receptor antagonist for clinical event reduction in acute coronary syndrome (TRA.CER) trial

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 34, Issue 23, Pages 1723-1731

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht104

Keywords

Myocardial infarction; Trials; Thrombosis

Funding

  1. Merck Co., Inc.
  2. Sanofi-Aventis
  3. Eli Lilly
  4. The Medicines Company
  5. National Institutes of Health
  6. Pfizer
  7. Roche
  8. Johnson Johnson
  9. Merck Sharpe Dohme
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. GlaxoSmithKline
  12. Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development
  13. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  14. Merck Sharp Dohme Corp
  15. Boehringer Ingelheim
  16. Sanofi-Aventis Canada
  17. Regado Biosciences
  18. Amylin
  19. Novartis
  20. Schering-Plough
  21. Bayer/Johnson Johnson
  22. Merck
  23. Portola
  24. Bayer
  25. Pozen
  26. Regado
  27. Daiichi Sankyo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The TRA.CER trial compared vorapaxar, a novel platelet protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 antagonist, with placebo in 12 944 patients with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS). In this analysis, we explored the effect of vorapaxar on myocardial infarction (MI). Methods and results A blinded, independent central endpoint adjudication committee prospectively defined and classified MI according to the universal MI definition, including peak cardiac marker value (creatine kinase-MB [CK-MB] and/or troponin). Because the trial failed to meet its primary endpoint, these analyses are considered exploratory. During a median follow-up of 502 days, 1580 MIs occurred in 1319 patients. The majority (n = 1025, 64.9) were type 1 (spontaneous) MI, followed by type 4a [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-related] MI (n = 352; 22.3). Compared with placebo, vorapaxar reduced the hazard of a first MI of any type by 12 [hazard ratio (HR), 0.88; 95 confidence interval (CI), 0.79-0.98; P = 0.021] and the hazard of total number of MIs (first and subsequent) by 14 (HR, 0.86; 95 CI, 0.77-0.97; P = 0.014), an effect that was sustained over time. Vorapaxar reduced type 1 MI by 17 (HR, 0.83; 95 CI, 0.73-0.95; P = 0.007). Type 4a MIs were not significantly reduced by vorapaxar (HR, 0.90; 95 CI, 0.73-1.12; P = 0.35). Vorapaxar effect was consistent across MI sizes defined by peak cardiac marker elevations and across key clinical subgroups; however, in patients not treated with thienopyridine at baseline (HR, 0.65; 95 CI, 0.46-0.92) compared with patients who received thienopyridine (HR, 0.91; 95 CI, 0.81-1.02), there was a trend towards a higher effect (P-int = 0.077). Conclusion The PAR-1 antagonist vorapaxar was associated with a reduction of MI, including total number of infarctions. This reduction was sustained over time and was mostly evident in type 1 MI, the most common type of MI observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available