4.7 Article

Resistant hypertension: a frequent and ominous finding among hypertensive patients with atherothrombosis

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 34, Issue 16, Pages 1204-1214

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs368

Keywords

Resistant hypertension; Atherosclerosis; Mortality; Stroke; Heart failure

Funding

  1. Sanofi-Aventis
  2. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  3. Waksman Foundation (Tokyo, Japan)
  4. Servier
  5. Intekrin Therapeutics
  6. Accumetrics
  7. AstraZeneca
  8. GlaxoSmithKline
  9. Merck
  10. Takeda
  11. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan
  12. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  13. Mardigian Foundation Varbedian Fund
  14. GORE
  15. Hewlett Foundation
  16. Eisai
  17. Berlinger-Ingelheim
  18. CV Therapeutics
  19. Daiichi-Sankyo
  20. Datascope
  21. Eli Lilly
  22. Marquet
  23. Schering-Plough
  24. Medicines Company
  25. Forest Labs
  26. Relapsya
  27. WebMD
  28. Amarin
  29. Ethicon
  30. Medtronic (co-PI of SYMPLICITY HTN-3)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of resistant hypertension on outcomes in patients with atherothrombotic disease is currently unknown. Accordingly, we sought to determine the prevalence and outcomes of resistant hypertension in stable hypertensive outpatients with subclinical or established atherothombotic disease enrolled in the international Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. Resistant hypertension was defined as a blood pressure 140/90 mmHg at baseline (130/80 mmHg if diabetes/renal insufficiency) with the use of 3 antihypertensive medications, including a diuretic. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 4 years. A total of 53 530 hypertensive patients were included. The prevalence of resistant hypertension was 12.7; 6.2 on 3 antihypertensive agents, 4.6 on 4 agents, and 1.9 on 5 agents (mean: 4.7 0.8). In addition to a diuretic, these patients were being treated mostly with ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (90.1), beta-blockers (67.0), and calcium channel blockers (50.8). Patients with resistant hypertension had a higher risk of the primary endpoint on multivariable analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 1.11, 95 confidence interval (CI) 1.021.20; P 0.017], including an increased non-fatal stroke risk (HR: 1.26; 95 CI: 1.101.45; P 0.0008). Hospitalizations due to congestive heart failure were higher (P 0.0001). Patients on 5 agents had a higher adjusted risk for the primary endpoint when compared with those on 3 agents (P 0.03). The presence of resistant hypertension identifies a subgroup of patients with hypertension and atherothrombosis who are at heightened risk for adverse long-term outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available