4.7 Article

Effect of ivabradine on recurrent hospitalization for worsening heart failure in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: the SHIFT Study

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 33, Issue 22, Pages 2813-2820

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs259

Keywords

Heart failure; Hospitalization; Ivabradine; Left ventricular systolic dysfunction; Heart rate

Funding

  1. Servier, Suresnes, France
  2. Servier, France
  3. Servier

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explored the effect of treatment with ivabradine, a pure heart rate-slowing agent, on recurrent hospitalizations for worsening heart failure (HF) in the SHIFT trial. SHIFT was a double-blind clinical trial in which 6505 patients with moderate-to-severe HF and left ventricular systolic dysfunction, all of whom had been hospitalized for HF during the preceding year, were randomized to ivabradine or to placebo on a background of guideline-recommended HF therapy (including maximized -blockade). In total, 1186 patients experienced at least one additional HF hospitalization during the study, 472 suffered at least two, and 218 suffered at least 3. Patients with additional HF hospitalizations had more severe disease than those without. Ivabradine was associated with fewer total HF hospitalizations [902 vs. 1211 events with placebo; incidence rate ratio, 0.75, 95 confidence interval (CI), 0.650.87, P 0.0002] during the 22.9-month median follow-up. Ivabradine-treated patients evidenced lower risk for a second or third additional HF hospitalization [hazard ratio (HR): 0.66, 95 CI, 0.550.79, P 0.001 and HR: 0.71, 95 CI, 0.540.93, P 0.012, respectively]. Similar observations were made for all-cause and cardiovascular hospitalizations. Treatment with ivabradine, on a background of guidelines-based HF therapy, is associated with a substantial reduction in the likelihood of recurrent hospitalizations for worsening HF. This benefit can be expected to improve the quality of life and to substantially reduce health-care costs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available