4.7 Article

Nationwide study of sudden cardiac death in persons aged 1-35 years

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 983-990

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq428

Keywords

Sudden death; Epidemiology; Young; Pathology; Registries; Autopsy

Funding

  1. Danish National Research Foundation Centre for Cardiac Arrhythmia (DARC)
  2. John and Birthe Meyer Foundation
  3. Danish Heart Foundation [07-10-R60-A1751-B743-22412]
  4. Research Foundation at the Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Bonnelykkefonden

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The aim of this investigation was to study the incidence of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in persons aged 1-35 years in a nationwide setting (5.38 million people) by systematic evaluation of all deaths. Methods and results All deaths in persons aged 1-35 years in Denmark in 2000-06 were included. Death certificates were read independently by two physicians. The National Patient Registry was used to retrieve information on prior medical history. All autopsy reports were read and the cause of death was revised based on autopsy findings. We identified 625 cases of sudden unexpected death (10% of all deaths), of which 156 (25%) were not autopsied. Of the 469 autopsied cases, 314 (67%) were SCD. The most common cardiac cause of death was ischaemic heart disease (13%); 29% of autopsied sudden unexpected death cases were unexplained. In 45% of SCD cases, the death was witnessed; 34% died during sleep; 89% were out-of-hospital deaths. Highest possible incidence rate of SCD in the young was 2.8 per 100 000 person-years including non-autopsied cases of sudden unexpected death. Excluding those, the incidence rate declined to 1.9 per 100 000 person-years. Conclusions A total of 7% of all deaths in the young can be attributed to SCD, when including non-autopsied cases (autopsy ratio 75%). The incidence rate of SCD in the young of 2.8 per 100 000 person-years is higher than previously reported.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available