4.7 Article

The European cardiac resynchronization therapy survey

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 30, Issue 20, Pages 2450-2460

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp359

Keywords

Cardiac resnchronization therapy (CRT); European practice; Survey

Funding

  1. EUCOMED
  2. Roche Diagnostics Ltd.
  3. HFA
  4. EHRA
  5. EUCOMED (Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Sorin and St. Jude Medical)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims The European cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) survey is a joint initiative taken by the Heart Failure Association and the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The primary aim of this survey is to describe current European practice associated with CRT implantations. Methods and results A total of 140 centres from 13 European countries contributed data from consecutive patients successfully implanted with a CRT device with or without an ICD between November 2008 and June 2009. The total number of patients enrolled was 2438. The median age of the patients was 70 years (IQR 62-76) and 31 % were >= 75 years. It was found that 78% were in NYHA functional class III or IV and 22% in I or II. The mean ejection fraction was 27% +/- 8 and the mean QRS duration 157 ms +/- 32. The QRS duration was <120 ms in 9%. Atrial fibrillation was reported in 23%. It was found that 26% of patients had a previously implanted permanent pacemaker or ICD; 76% of procedures were performed by an electrophysiologist; 82% had an elective admission for implantation and the median duration of hospitalization was 3 days (IQR 2-7); and 73% received a CRT-D device which was more often implanted in men, younger patients, and with ischaemic aetiology. The mean QRS duration was reduced to 133 ms +/- 27 (P < 0.0001) at discharge. Peri-procedural complication rates were comparable to the rates reported in randomized trials. Conclusion This CRT survey provides important information describing current European practice with regard to patient demographics, selection criteria, procedural routines, and status at discharge. These data should be useful for benchmarking individual patient management and national practice against wider experience.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available