4.8 Article

In Situ Measurement of Magnetization Relaxation of Internalized Nanoparticles in Live Cells

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 231-240

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/nn503888j

Keywords

AC susceptibility; hyperthermia; magnetic nanoparticles; magnetization relaxation; cellular internalization

Funding

  1. European Commission under the FP7 Marie Curie Initial Training Network, MagneticFUN
  2. EPSRC Centre for Innovative Manufacturing in Regenerative Medicine [EP/H028277/1]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [1131730, EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. EPSRC [EP/H028277/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magnetization relaxation mechanisms strongly influence how magnetic nanoparticles respond to high-frequency fields in applications such as magnetic hyperthermia. The dominant mechanism depends on the mobility of the particles, which will be affected in turn by their microenvironment. In this study AC susceptometry was used to follow the in situ magnetic response of model systems of blocked and superparamagnetic nanoparticles, following their cellular internalization and subsequent release by freezethaw lysis. The AC susceptibility signal from internalized particles in live cells showed only Neel relaxation, consistent with measurements of immobilized nanoparticle suspensions. However, Brownian relaxation was restored after cell lysis, indicating that the immobilization effect was reversible and that nanoparticle integrity was maintained in the cells. The results presented demonstrate that cellular internalization can disable Brownian relaxation, which has significant implications for designing suitable nanoparticles for intracellular hyperthermia applications. Further to this, the results highlight the possibility that particles could be released in reusable form from degrading cells following hyperthermia treatment, and subsequently reabsorbed by viable cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available